Nate uploaded the SpaceCats camera calibration video today. I got 3 screenshots, one with the camera at 3, 6, and 9 feet.

Picture one: (855, 328) -> (850, 643). Pixel length: 315 pixels.

Picture two: (866, 434) -> (863, 599). Pixel length: 165

Picture 3: (583, 582) -> (852, 498). Pixel length: 84 pixels.

So I think this data shows that there isn’t a direct relationship between the Pixels per meter ratio and the target distance… Hm. After plugging these numbers into my calculator, it gave me a linear and quadratic regression.

Linear: -121x + 1318

Quadratic: 12X^2 + -266x +1683

I feel the quadratic to be more accurate, but I would like a second opinion on that.

I think I need some help. -Beau